↓ Skip to main content

Functional connectivity dynamics during film viewing reveal common networks for different emotional experiences

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Functional connectivity dynamics during film viewing reveal common networks for different emotional experiences
Published in
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, May 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13415-016-0425-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gal Raz, Alexandra Touroutoglou, Christine Wilson-Mendenhall, Gadi Gilam, Tamar Lin, Tal Gonen, Yael Jacob, Shir Atzil, Roee Admon, Maya Bleich-Cohen, Adi Maron-Katz, Talma Hendler, Lisa Feldman Barrett

Abstract

Recent theoretical and empirical work has highlighted the role of domain-general, large-scale brain networks in generating emotional experiences. These networks are hypothesized to process aspects of emotional experiences that are not unique to a specific emotional category (e.g., "sadness," "happiness"), but rather that generalize across categories. In this article, we examined the dynamic interactions (i.e., changing cohesiveness) between specific domain-general networks across time while participants experienced various instances of sadness, fear, and anger. We used a novel method for probing the network connectivity dynamics between two salience networks and three amygdala-based networks. We hypothesized, and found, that the functional connectivity between these networks covaried with the intensity of different emotional experiences. Stronger connectivity between the dorsal salience network and the medial amygdala network was associated with more intense ratings of emotional experience across six different instances of the three emotion categories examined. Also, stronger connectivity between the dorsal salience network and the ventrolateral amygdala network was associated with more intense ratings of emotional experience across five out of the six different instances. Our findings demonstrate that a variety of emotional experiences are associated with dynamic interactions of domain-general neural systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 162 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 22%
Researcher 29 17%
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 30 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 52 31%
Neuroscience 37 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 44 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2016.
All research outputs
#6,218,703
of 24,980,180 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#249
of 987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,867
of 304,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,980,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.