↓ Skip to main content

Canine bacterial urinary tract infections: New developments in old pathogens

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Journal, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Canine bacterial urinary tract infections: New developments in old pathogens
Published in
Veterinary Journal, January 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.11.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary F. Thompson, Annette L. Litster, Joanne L. Platell, Darren J. Trott

Abstract

Uncomplicated bacterial urinary tract infections (UTIs) occur commonly in dogs. Persistent or recurrent infections are reported less frequently. They typically occur in dogs with an underlying disease and are sometimes asymptomatic, especially in dogs with predisposing chronic disease. Escherichia coli is the organism most frequently cultured in both simple and complicated UTIs. Organisms such as Enterococcus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. are less common in uncomplicated UTI, but become increasingly prominent in dogs with recurrent UTI. The ability of bacteria to acquire resistance to antimicrobials and/or to evade host immune defence mechanisms is vital for persistence in the urinary tract. Antimicrobial therapy limitations and bacterial strains with such abilities require novel control strategies. Sharing of resistant bacteria between humans and dogs has been recently documented and is of particular concern for E. coli O25b:H4-ST131 strains that are both virulent and multi-drug resistant. The epidemiology of complicated UTIs, pathogenic traits of uropathogens and new therapeutic concepts are outlined in this review.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 238 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 15%
Student > Bachelor 33 14%
Researcher 25 10%
Other 23 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Other 45 19%
Unknown 58 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 81 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 62 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2014.
All research outputs
#17,490,079
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Journal
#1,344
of 2,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,374
of 204,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Journal
#14
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.