↓ Skip to main content

Revision strategies for failed adult spinal deformity surgery

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Revision strategies for failed adult spinal deformity surgery
Published in
European Spine Journal, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s00586-019-06283-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlotta Martini, Francesco Langella, Luca Mazzucchelli, Claudio Lamartina

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 25%
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Professor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 50%
Engineering 3 8%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Design 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2020.
All research outputs
#18,707,884
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#2,519
of 4,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#334,508
of 456,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#37
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,707 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.