Title |
Revision strategies for failed adult spinal deformity surgery
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Spine Journal, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00586-019-06283-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carlotta Martini, Francesco Langella, Luca Mazzucchelli, Claudio Lamartina |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 9 | 25% |
Researcher | 8 | 22% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Professor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 50% |
Engineering | 3 | 8% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
Design | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2020.
All research outputs
#18,707,884
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#2,519
of 4,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#334,508
of 456,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#37
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,707 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.