You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
I'm a Hypocrite, but So Is Everyone Else: Group Support and the Reduction of Cognitive Dissonance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice , September 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1037/1089-2699.7.3.214 |
| Authors |
Blake M. McKimmie, Deborah J. Terry, Michael A. Hogg, Antony S. R. Manstead, Russell Spears, Bertjan Doosje |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 153 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 42 | 25% |
| Unknown | 16 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 92 | 56% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 184. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2022.
All research outputs
#217,521
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice
#3
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154
of 53,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them