↓ Skip to main content

Consanguineous Chinese Familial Study Reveals that a Gross Deletion that Includes the SYCE1 Gene Region Is Associated with Premature Ovarian Insufficiency

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Sciences, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Consanguineous Chinese Familial Study Reveals that a Gross Deletion that Includes the SYCE1 Gene Region Is Associated with Premature Ovarian Insufficiency
Published in
Reproductive Sciences, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s43032-019-00037-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Zhe, Desheng Ye, Xin Chen, Yudong Liu, Xingyu Zhou, Ying Li, Jun Zhang, Shiling Chen

Abstract

Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) is a highly heterogeneous ovarian disorder. Genetic factors account for the cause of POI. We aimed to analyze the genetic alterations in two affected sisters diagnosed with POI and their parents from a highly consanguineous Chinese Han family. Whole-exome sequencing was performed, and bioinformatics analysis was used to determine the potential genetic cause of POI in this family. A SYCE1 deletion was verified by Sanger sequencing. A homozygous deletion in SYCE1 was harbored by the proband and her affected sister, whereas both parents had heterozygous deletions. There were distinct differences in the amino acid sequences between wild-type and SYCE1 deletion. Domain analysis and 3D structural analysis of the SYCE1 deletion was also performed to evaluate the potential impact and pathogenicity of POI. The SYCE1 domain structure was truncated. Additionally, the 3D structure showed that the SYCE1 deletion changed the shape of the protein compared with that of wild-type SYCE1. This study revealed a novel SYCE1 deletion. This SYCE1 deletion may be the cause of POI. Genetic counseling for POI is helpful for researchers and clinicians to identify the mode of genetic inheritance for SYCE1 deletion in POI pathology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 38%
Unspecified 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2020.
All research outputs
#20,599,981
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Sciences
#894
of 1,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#381,353
of 456,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Sciences
#75
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.