↓ Skip to main content

Artificial reproduction technologies (RTs) – all the way to the artificial womb?

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 623)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Artificial reproduction technologies (RTs) – all the way to the artificial womb?
Published in
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, September 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11019-006-0005-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frida Simonstein

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that the development of an artificial womb is already well on its way. By putting together pieces of information arising from new scientific advances in different areas, (neo-natal care, gynecology, embryology, the human genome project and computer science), I delineate a distinctive picture, which clearly suggests that the artificial womb may become a reality sooner than we may think. Currently, there is a huge gap between the first stages of gestation (using in vitro fertilization) and the 22nd week (inside the womb). At the present time this gap seems an insurmountable barrier for fully developing a fetus outside a natural womb - a notion better known as ectogenesis. The history of science however, suggests that impenetrable barriers are such only temporarily. It is just a matter of time (and due research) until someone - intentionally or by chance - accesses the right answer and finds a way to overcome existing obstacles. Despite misgivings that the case of the artificial womb presents too many barriers, it would be naive to suppose things would happen any differently. I observe in this paper, that it is time to acknowledge the consequences of new developments in different areas of scientific research which are leading to the advent of an artificial womb; and I modestly suggest that we might initiate a discussion on this topic now, while we have still enough time to decide what we may want and why.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 42 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 32%
Student > Master 8 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 19%
Social Sciences 6 13%
Engineering 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,803,961
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
#47
of 623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,369
of 88,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.