↓ Skip to main content

合田濤著, 『首狩りと言霊 : フィリピン・ボントック族の社会構造と世界観』, 初版, 東京, 弘文堂, 1989年, 392頁, 7,730円

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Ethnology, June 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
合田濤著, 『首狩りと言霊 : フィリピン・ボントック族の社会構造と世界観』, 初版, 東京, 弘文堂, 1989年, 392頁, 7,730円
Published in
Japanese Journal of Ethnology, June 1994
DOI 10.14890/minkennewseries.59.1_80
Authors

杉島 敬志

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2020.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Ethnology
#89
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,416
of 20,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Ethnology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them