↓ Skip to main content

The Zone of Social Abandonment in Cultural Geography: On the Street in the United States, Inside the Family in India

Overview of attention for article published in Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
The Zone of Social Abandonment in Cultural Geography: On the Street in the United States, Inside the Family in India
Published in
Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11013-012-9266-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jocelyn Marrow, Tanya Marie Luhrmann

Abstract

This essay examines the spaces across societies in which persons with severe mental illness lose meaningful social roles and are reduced to "bare life." Comparing ethnographic and interview data from the United States and India, we suggest that these processes of exclusion take place differently: on the street in the United States, and in the family household in India. We argue that cultural, historical, and economic factors determine which spaces become zones of social abandonment across societies. We compare strategies for managing and treating persons with psychosis across the United States and India, and demonstrate that the relative efficiency of state surveillance of populations and availability of public social and psychiatric services, the relative importance of family honor, the extent to which a culture of psychopharmaceutical use has penetrated social life, and other historical features, contribute to circumstances in which disordered Indian persons are more likely to be forcefully "hidden" in domestic space, whereas mentally ill persons in the United States are more likely to be expelled to the street. However, in all locations, social marginalization takes place by stripping away the subject's efficacy in social communication. That is, the socially "dead" lose communicative efficacy, a predicament, following Agamben, we describe as "bare voice."

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 130 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 25 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Researcher 11 8%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 23 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 31 24%
Unspecified 25 19%
Psychology 15 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 25 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2012.
All research outputs
#2,395,734
of 25,464,544 outputs
Outputs from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#105
of 646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,401
of 176,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,464,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.