↓ Skip to main content

IDH Mutation and Neuroglial Developmental Features Define Clinically Distinct Subclasses of Lower Grade Diffuse Astrocytic Glioma

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
IDH Mutation and Neuroglial Developmental Features Define Clinically Distinct Subclasses of Lower Grade Diffuse Astrocytic Glioma
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, April 2012
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-2977
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Gorovets, Kasthuri Kannan, Ronglai Shen, Edward R. Kastenhuber, Nasrin Islamdoust, Carl Campos, Elena Pentsova, Adriana Heguy, Suresh C. Jhanwar, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Timothy A. Chan, Jason T. Huse

Abstract

Diffuse gliomas represent the most prevalent class of primary brain tumor. Despite significant recent advances in the understanding of glioblastoma [World Health Organization (WHO) IV], its most malignant subtype, lower grade (WHO II and III) glioma variants remain comparatively understudied, especially in light of their notable clinical heterogeneity. Accordingly, we sought to identify and characterize clinically relevant molecular subclasses of lower grade diffuse astrocytic gliomas.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 96 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 18%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 9 9%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 9%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 20 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2018.
All research outputs
#6,379,134
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#5,955
of 12,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,175
of 162,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#64
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.