You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biomimetic cellular vectors for enhancing drug delivery to the lungs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-55909-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Evangelopoulos, Iman K. Yazdi, Stefania Acciardo, Roberto Palomba, Federica Giordano, Anna Pasto, Manuela Sushnitha, Jonathan O. Martinez, Nupur Basu, Armando Torres, Sarah Hmaidan, Alessandro Parodi, Ennio Tasciotti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 38% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,204,044
of 24,998,746 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#42,273
of 137,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,359
of 469,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,392
of 4,339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,998,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 137,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.