You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diversity of Bifidobacteria within the Infant Gut Microbiota
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0036957 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesca Turroni, Clelia Peano, Daniel A. Pass, Elena Foroni, Marco Severgnini, Marcus J. Claesson, Colm Kerr, Jonathan Hourihane, Deirdre Murray, Fabio Fuligni, Miguel Gueimonde, Abelardo Margolles, Gianluca De Bellis, Paul W. O’Toole, Douwe van Sinderen, Julian R. Marchesi, Marco Ventura |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 621 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 595 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 118 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 112 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 95 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 67 | 11% |
| Other | 28 | 5% |
| Other | 87 | 14% |
| Unknown | 114 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 197 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 81 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 70 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 60 | 10% |
| Unknown | 130 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#843,634
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#11,086
of 224,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,091
of 177,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#150
of 3,837 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,837 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.