↓ Skip to main content

Disposable nappies for preventing napkin dermatitis in infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Disposable nappies for preventing napkin dermatitis in infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004262.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erica L Baer, Mark W Davies, Kirsty Easterbrook

Abstract

Napkin dermatitis is a common condition that occurs in otherwise healthy infants. It causes discomfort to infants, anxiety to parents and caregivers and contributes to the load on the health care system. A large variety of napkins, both disposable and non-disposable, are available. Evidence is required to assist carers and health care workers in making informed decisions when balancing the pros and cons of different napkin choices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 120 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 16%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 6 5%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 40 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Psychology 7 6%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 45 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2022.
All research outputs
#5,363,297
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,295
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,696
of 90,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.