↓ Skip to main content

Benefits of short-term or prolonged as compared to standard 1 year DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of 9 randomized trials

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Benefits of short-term or prolonged as compared to standard 1 year DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of 9 randomized trials
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s11239-019-02033-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monica Verdoia, Elvin Kedhi, Harry Suryapranata, Giacomo Frati, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe De Luca

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 18 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 38%
Psychology 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2020.
All research outputs
#14,407,599
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#589
of 997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,703
of 456,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#17
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.