↓ Skip to main content

Revisiting Jaccoud Arthropathy as an Ultrasound Diagnosed Erosive Arthropathy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Rheumatology, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Revisiting Jaccoud Arthropathy as an Ultrasound Diagnosed Erosive Arthropathy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Published in
Journal of Clinical Rheumatology, December 2007
DOI 10.1097/rhu.0b013e31815bfe14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lesley Ann Saketkoo, Robert Quinet

Abstract

Jaccoud arthropathy (JA), now most commonly associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), is widely perceived as a benign joint deformity that is radiographically nonerosive and that confers little if any disability. Advances and accessibility of imaging modalities such as ultrasound (US) are challenging the complacency in perceiving SLE-JA and SLE arthritis as benign processes. Prompted by a patient with SLE-JA in which joint erosion was detectable on US but not evident on radiograph, this review assesses the potential utility of US to guide management and promote understanding of SLE arthritis and its poorly understood pathogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2012.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Rheumatology
#1,252
of 2,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,793
of 166,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Rheumatology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,118 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them