You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Applying circuit theory and landscape linkage maps to reintroduction planning for California Condors
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2019
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0226491 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jesse D’Elia, Joseph Brandt, L. Joseph Burnett, Susan M. Haig, Jeff Hollenbeck, Steve Kirkland, Bruce G. Marcot, Arianna Punzalan, Christopher J. West, Tiana Williams-Claussen, Rachel Wolstenholme, Rich Young |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 18% |
Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 21% |
Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 9 | 26% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 24% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 14 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2020.
All research outputs
#15,595,621
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#134,068
of 198,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,418
of 456,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,715
of 2,536 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,536 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.