↓ Skip to main content

Diffuse and Pulsating Aurora

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Diffuse and Pulsating Aurora
Published in
Space Science Reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s11214-019-0629-3
Authors

Yukitoshi Nishimura, Marc R. Lessard, Yuto Katoh, Yoshizumi Miyoshi, Eric Grono, Noora Partamies, Nithin Sivadas, Keisuke Hosokawa, Mizuki Fukizawa, Marilia Samara, Robert G. Michell, Ryuho Kataoka, Takeshi Sakanoi, Daniel K. Whiter, Shin-ichiro Oyama, Yasunobu Ogawa, Satoshi Kurita

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 23%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 19 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 17 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 17%
Computer Science 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 21 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2020.
All research outputs
#16,689,742
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#1,160
of 1,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,164
of 482,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#18
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.