| Title |
Impact of acyclovir use on survival of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and high load herpes simplex virus replication
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2701-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lukas Schuierer, Michael Gebhard, Hans-Georg Ruf, Ulrich Jaschinski, Thomas M. Berghaus, Michael Wittmann, Georg Braun, Dirk H. Busch, Reinhard Hoffmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 18% |
| Serbia | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 22% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,680,249
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,812
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,285
of 473,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#56
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.