| Title |
Clostridioides difficile (formerly Clostridium difficile) infection in the critically ill: an expert statement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-019-05873-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Massimo Antonelli, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, George Dimopoulos, Antonio Gasbarrini, Maria Sole Vallecoccia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 12 | 12% |
| Spain | 6 | 6% |
| Japan | 5 | 5% |
| Colombia | 4 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Singapore | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 38 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 81 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 12% |
| Scientists | 4 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 24% |
| Unknown | 24 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#815,309
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#766
of 5,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,201
of 483,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#29
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.