↓ Skip to main content

On the instability of majority decision-making: testing the implications of the ‘chaos theorems’ in a laboratory experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Theory and Decision, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
On the instability of majority decision-making: testing the implications of the ‘chaos theorems’ in a laboratory experiment
Published in
Theory and Decision, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s11238-019-09741-4
Authors

Jan Sauermann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 33%
Researcher 2 22%
Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 22%
Chemical Engineering 1 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 11%
Psychology 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,382,430
of 24,565,648 outputs
Outputs from Theory and Decision
#58
of 274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,553
of 467,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory and Decision
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,565,648 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 274 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.