↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of tiotropium, long-acting β2-agonists and leukotriene receptor antagonists on lung function and exacerbations in paediatric patients with asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of tiotropium, long-acting β2-agonists and leukotriene receptor antagonists on lung function and exacerbations in paediatric patients with asthma
Published in
Respiratory Research, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12931-020-1282-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Vogelberg, Stanley Goldstein, LeRoy Graham, Alan Kaplan, Alberto de la Hoz, Eckard Hamelmann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 19 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 27%
Unspecified 6 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 19 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,018,533
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#352
of 3,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,401
of 473,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#12
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.