| Title |
Heterogeneity of treatment effect of prophylactic pantoprazole in adult ICU patients: a post hoc analysis of the SUP-ICU trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-019-05903-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anders Granholm, Søren Marker, Mette Krag, Fernando G. Zampieri, Hans-Christian Thorsen-Meyer, Benjamin Skov Kaas-Hansen, Iwan C. C. van der Horst, Theis Lange, Jørn Wetterslev, Anders Perner, Morten Hylander Møller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 4 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Thailand | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 22% |
| Scientists | 5 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,428,369
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,824
of 5,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,036
of 480,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#58
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.