| Title |
Defining and measuring imaging appropriateness in low back pain studies: a scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-019-06269-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Yates, Crystian B. Oliveira, James B. Galloway, Chris G. Maher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 16% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 16% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 19% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,460,626
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#225
of 5,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,917
of 479,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#5
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,307 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.