Title |
Agnostic Science. Towards a Philosophy of Data Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Foundations of Science, June 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10699-010-9186-7 |
Authors |
D. Napoletani, M. Panza, D. C. Struppa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 37 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 16% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 4 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 16% |
Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Philosophy | 6 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 26% |
Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2020.
All research outputs
#6,000,057
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from Foundations of Science
#60
of 277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,103
of 95,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Foundations of Science
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.