↓ Skip to main content

Saccade accuracy as an indicator of the competition between functional asymmetries in vision

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Saccade accuracy as an indicator of the competition between functional asymmetries in vision
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s00221-019-05717-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jérôme Tagu, Karine Doré-Mazars, Dorine Vergilino-Perez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 27%
Other 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 27%
Neuroscience 4 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2020.
All research outputs
#14,936,972
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#1,917
of 3,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,721
of 456,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#34
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.