| Title |
The value of monitoring wildlife roadkill
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10344-019-1357-4 |
| Authors |
Amy L. W. Schwartz, Fraser M. Shilling, Sarah E. Perkins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 25% |
| United States | 5 | 7% |
| Australia | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Thailand | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 37 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 77% |
| Scientists | 12 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 292 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 12% |
| Researcher | 34 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 38 | 13% |
| Unknown | 106 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 59 | 20% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 9 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Unknown | 120 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 147. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2023.
All research outputs
#286,449
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#6
of 1,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,223
of 480,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.