| Title |
Surgical correction of kyphotic deformity in spinal tuberculosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Orthopaedics, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00264-011-1292-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul S. Issack, Oheneba Boachie-Adjei |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 63% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2016.
All research outputs
#4,189,055
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from International Orthopaedics
#155
of 1,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,561
of 113,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Orthopaedics
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,434 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.