| Title |
Blood loss in total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Orthopaedics, March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00264-006-0096-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Narayana Prasad, Vinod Padmanabhan, Arun Mullaji |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 27 | 22% |
| Unknown | 35 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 37 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2016.
All research outputs
#4,189,055
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from International Orthopaedics
#155
of 1,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,748
of 66,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Orthopaedics
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,434 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.