| Title |
The impact factor of rheumatology journals: an analysis of 2008 and the recent 10 years
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Rheumatology International, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00296-010-1541-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Min Chen, Ming-Hui Zhao, Cees G. M. Kallenberg |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 36% |
| Other | 3 | 27% |
| Professor | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 18% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2017.
All research outputs
#5,758,964
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology International
#556
of 2,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,243
of 96,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology International
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.