You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Credibility aspects of research-based gaming in science communication — the case of The Maladaptation Game
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JCOM - Journal of Science Communication, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.22323/2.19010201 |
| Authors |
Therese Asplund |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Italy | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 7 | 23% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,853,071
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JCOM - Journal of Science Communication
#280
of 543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,087
of 473,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCOM - Journal of Science Communication
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.