↓ Skip to main content

Formation mechanism and applications of cenospheres: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Formation mechanism and applications of cenospheres: a review
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s10853-019-04341-7
Authors

Aamar Danish, Mohammad Ali Mosaberpanah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Student > Master 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 43 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 14 17%
Materials Science 7 8%
Chemical Engineering 5 6%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Energy 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 45 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2020.
All research outputs
#18,707,884
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#3,979
of 4,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#334,533
of 456,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#27
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,644 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.