You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Breadth of Media Scanning Leads to Vaping among Youth and Young Adults: Evidence of Direct and Indirect Pathways from a National Longitudinal Survey
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Health Communication, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1080/10810730.2019.1709925 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jiaying Liu, Kirsten Lochbuehler, Qinghua Yang, Laura A. Gibson, Robert C. Hornik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 27 | 53% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Georgia | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 46 | 90% |
Scientists | 3 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
Researcher | 4 | 7% |
Professor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 30 | 52% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 5 | 9% |
Psychology | 4 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 35 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2020.
All research outputs
#942,979
of 24,911,633 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Communication
#66
of 1,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,956
of 469,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Communication
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,911,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,399 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.