↓ Skip to main content

Loss-of-Function Mutations of ILDR1 Cause Autosomal-Recessive Hearing Impairment DFNB42

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Human Genetics, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Loss-of-Function Mutations of ILDR1 Cause Autosomal-Recessive Hearing Impairment DFNB42
Published in
American Journal of Human Genetics, January 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.12.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guntram Borck, Atteeq Ur Rehman, Kwanghyuk Lee, Hans-Martin Pogoda, Naseebullah Kakar, Simon von Ameln, Nicolas Grillet, Michael S. Hildebrand, Zubair M. Ahmed, Gudrun Nürnberg, Muhammad Ansar, Sulman Basit, Qamar Javed, Robert J. Morell, Nabilah Nasreen, A. Eliot Shearer, Adeel Ahmad, Kimia Kahrizi, Rehan S. Shaikh, Rana A. Ali, Shaheen N. Khan, Ingrid Goebel, Nicole C. Meyer, William J. Kimberling, Jennifer A. Webster, Dietrich A. Stephan, Martin R. Schiller, Melanie Bahlo, Hossein Najmabadi, Peter G. Gillespie, Peter Nürnberg, Bernd Wollnik, Saima Riazuddin, Richard J.H. Smith, Wasim Ahmad, Ulrich Müller, Matthias Hammerschmidt, Thomas B. Friedman, Riazuddin, Suzanne M. Leal, Jamil Ahmad, Christian Kubisch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 18%
Other 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 26 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,204,326
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#3,131
of 5,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,268
of 193,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#17
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.