| Title |
Should the ultrasound probe replace your stethoscope? A SICS-I sub-study comparing lung ultrasound and pulmonary auscultation in the critically ill
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2719-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eline G. M. Cox, Geert Koster, Aidan Baron, Thomas Kaufmann, Ruben J. Eck, T. Corien Veenstra, Bart Hiemstra, Adrian Wong, Thomas C. Kwee, Jaap E. Tulleken, Frederik Keus, Renske Wiersema, Iwan C. C. van der Horst |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 226 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 27 | 12% |
| Spain | 14 | 6% |
| Mexico | 13 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 5% |
| Colombia | 7 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 3% |
| Australia | 6 | 3% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 46 | 20% |
| Unknown | 85 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 161 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 40 | 18% |
| Scientists | 20 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 23% |
| Unknown | 30 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 152. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2023.
All research outputs
#274,425
of 25,634,695 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#133
of 6,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,905
of 478,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,634,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.