↓ Skip to main content

Systematics of Gamow-Teller beta decay “Southeast” of 100Sn

Overview of attention for article published in The European Physical Journal A, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Systematics of Gamow-Teller beta decay “Southeast” of 100Sn
Published in
The European Physical Journal A, September 2010
DOI 10.1140/epja/i2010-11025-x
Authors

L. Batist, M. Górska, H. Grawe, Z. Janas, M. Kavatsyuk, M. Karny, R. Kirchner, M. La Commara, I. Mukha, A. Plochocki, E. Roeckl

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 42%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 7 58%
Computer Science 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,066,170
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal A
#207
of 1,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,628
of 97,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal A
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,862 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them