| Title |
What Factors Predict Failure 4 to 12 Years After Periacetabular Osteotomy?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-012-2386-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlotte Hartig-Andreasen, Anders Troelsen, Theis Muncholm Thillemann, Kjeld Søballe |
| Abstract |
The goal of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is to delay or prevent osteoarthritic development in dysplastic hips. However, it is unclear whether the surgical goals are achieved and if so in which patients. This information is essential to select appropriate patients for a durable PAO that achieves its goals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 29% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 58% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2012.
All research outputs
#14,388,554
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#4,368
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,856
of 176,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#42
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.