↓ Skip to main content

Glucose transporter-1 deficiency syndrome: the expanding clinical and genetic spectrum of a treatable disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Brain, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
323 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Glucose transporter-1 deficiency syndrome: the expanding clinical and genetic spectrum of a treatable disorder
Published in
Brain, February 2010
DOI 10.1093/brain/awp336
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilhelmina G. Leen, Joerg Klepper, Marcel M. Verbeek, Maike Leferink, Tom Hofste, Baziel G. van Engelen, Ron A. Wevers, Todd Arthur, Nadia Bahi-Buisson, Diana Ballhausen, Jolita Bekhof, Patrick van Bogaert, Inês Carrilho, Brigitte Chabrol, Michael P. Champion, James Coldwell, Peter Clayton, Elizabeth Donner, Athanasios Evangeliou, Friedrich Ebinger, Kevin Farrell, Rob J. Forsyth, Christian G. E. L. de Goede, Stephanie Gross, Stephanie Grunewald, Hans Holthausen, Sandeep Jayawant, Katherine Lachlan, Vincent Laugel, Kathy Leppig, Ming J. Lim, Grazia Mancini, Adela Della Marina, Loreto Martorell, Joe McMenamin, Marije E. C. Meuwissen, Helen Mundy, Nils O. Nilsson, Axel Panzer, Bwee T. Poll-The, Christian Rauscher, Christophe M. R. Rouselle, Inger Sandvig, Thomas Scheffner, Eamonn Sheridan, Neil Simpson, Parol Sykora, Richard Tomlinson, John Trounce, David Webb, Bernhard Weschke, Hans Scheffer, Michél A. Willemsen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 4 2%
United States 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Unknown 174 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Master 16 9%
Other 15 8%
Other 43 23%
Unknown 39 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 7%
Neuroscience 10 5%
Psychology 8 4%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 49 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Brain
#5,259
of 7,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,180
of 176,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain
#26
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.