You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A modified Delphi study to identify the features of high quality measurement plans for healthcare improvement projects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0886-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Woodcock, Yewande Adeleke, Christine Goeschel, Peter Pronovost, Mary Dixon-Woods |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 37% |
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Djibouti | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 74% |
| Scientists | 6 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 37 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 22% |
| Unknown | 41 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,428,093
of 24,579,513 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#174
of 2,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,080
of 467,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#10
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,579,513 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.