You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Randomised controlled trial of the Lidcombe programme of early stuttering intervention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, August 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.38520.451840.e0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Jones, Mark Onslow, Ann Packman, Shelley Williams, Tika Ormond, Ilsa Schwarz, Val Gebski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 209 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 8% |
| Researcher | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 50 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 19% |
| Psychology | 31 | 14% |
| Linguistics | 28 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 55 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2013.
All research outputs
#7,116,737
of 25,578,098 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#35,569
of 64,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,733
of 68,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#96
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,578,098 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.