Title |
Coordinated and Tailored Work Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Economic Evaluation Undertaken with Workers on Sick Leave Due to Musculoskeletal Disorders
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, January 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10926-009-9162-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ute Bültmann, David Sherson, Jens Olsen, Carl Lysbeck Hansen, Thomas Lund, Jørgen Kilsgaard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Denmark | 2 | 2% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 110 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 24 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 16% |
Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
Other | 25 | 21% |
Unknown | 19 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 28% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
Psychology | 11 | 9% |
Arts and Humanities | 5 | 4% |
Other | 20 | 17% |
Unknown | 25 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,767,796
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#48
of 680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,346
of 186,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them