↓ Skip to main content

Music Taste Groups and Problem Behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Music Taste Groups and Problem Behavior
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10964-006-9090-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juul Mulder, Tom ter Bogt, Quinten Raaijmakers, Wilma Vollebergh

Abstract

Internalizing and externalizing problems differ by musical tastes. A high school-based sample of 4159 adolescents, representative of Dutch youth aged 12 to 16, reported on their personal and social characteristics, music preferences and social-psychological functioning, measured with the Youth Self-Report (YSR). Cluster analysis on their music preferences revealed six taste groups: Middle-of-the-road (MOR) listeners, Urban fans, Exclusive Rock fans, Rock-Pop fans, Elitists, and Omnivores. A seventh group of musically Low-Involved youth was added. Multivariate analyses revealed that when gender, age, parenting, school, and peer variables were controlled, Omnivores and fans within the Exclusive Rock groups showed relatively high scores on internalizing YSR measures, and social, thought and attention problems. Omnivores, Exclusive Rock, Rock-Pop and Urban fans reported more externalizing problem behavior. Belonging to the MOR group that highly appreciates the most popular, chart-based pop music appears to buffer problem behavior. Music taste group membership uniquely explains variance in both internalizing and externalizing problem behavior.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
France 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 117 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Student > Master 19 15%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 29%
Social Sciences 23 19%
Arts and Humanities 11 9%
Computer Science 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 22 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2020.
All research outputs
#5,032,776
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#564
of 1,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,593
of 67,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#9
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.