| Title |
Decentralising NCD management in rural southern Africa: evaluation of a pilot implementation study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7994-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashley Sharp, Nick Riches, Annastesia Mims, Sweetness Ntshalintshali, David McConalogue, Paul Southworth, Callum Pierce, Philip Daniels, Muhindo Kalungero, Futhi Ndzinisa, Ekta Elston, Valephi Okello, John Walley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uganda | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Eswatini | 1 | 11% |
| Malawi | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 47 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,848,377
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,278
of 15,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,934
of 456,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#91
of 315 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 315 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.