| Title |
Fulminant corticobasal degeneration: a distinct variant with predominant neuronal tau aggregates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00401-019-02119-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen Ling, Ellen Gelpi, Karen Davey, Zane Jaunmuktane, Kin Y. Mok, Edwin Jabbari, Roberto Simone, Lea R’Bibo, Sebastian Brandner, Matthew J. Ellis, Johannes Attems, David Mann, Glenda M. Halliday, S. Al-Sarraj, J. Hedreen, James W. Ironside, Gabor G. Kovacs, E. Kovari, S. Love, Jean Paul G. Vonsattel, Kieren S. J. Allinson, Daniela Hansen, Teisha Bradshaw, Núria Setó-Salvia, Selina Wray, Rohan de Silva, Huw R. Morris, Thomas T. Warner, John Hardy, Janice L. Holton, Tamas Revesz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 48% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 9 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,129,438
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#189
of 2,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,392
of 456,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.