| Title |
Overcoming barriers to evidence-based patient blood management: a restricted review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-020-0965-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alana Delaforce, Jed Duff, Judy Munday, Janet Hardy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 16% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 31% |
| Scientists | 6 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 27 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 23% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 31 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,779,580
of 25,534,033 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#330
of 1,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,510
of 478,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,534,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.