↓ Skip to main content

Operational Stability of Organic Field‐Effect Transistors

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Materials, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
218 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Operational Stability of Organic Field‐Effect Transistors
Published in
Advanced Materials, February 2012
DOI 10.1002/adma.201104580
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter A. Bobbert, Abhinav Sharma, Simon G. J. Mathijssen, Martijn Kemerink, Dago M. de Leeuw

Abstract

Organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) are considered in technological applications for which low cost or mechanical flexibility are crucial factors. The environmental stability of the organic semiconductors used in OFETs has improved to a level that is now sufficient for commercialization. However, serious problems remain with the stability of OFETs under operation. The causes for this have remained elusive for many years. Surface potentiometry together with theoretical modeling provide new insights into the mechanisms limiting the operational stability. These indicate that redox reactions involving water are involved in an exchange of mobile charges in the semiconductor with protons in the gate dielectric. This mechanism elucidates the established key role of water and leads in a natural way to a universal "stress function", describing the stretched exponential-like time dependence ubiquitously observed. Further study is needed to determine the generality of the mechanism and the role of other mechanisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 5 2%
United States 4 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 257 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 31%
Researcher 49 18%
Student > Master 37 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 38 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 61 22%
Chemistry 52 19%
Materials Science 52 19%
Engineering 50 18%
Chemical Engineering 4 1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 48 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#5,021,056
of 24,602,766 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Materials
#4,884
of 16,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,097
of 256,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Materials
#66
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,602,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.