↓ Skip to main content

Glycoprotein Nonmetastatic B Is an Independent Prognostic Indicator of Recurrence and a Novel Therapeutic Target in Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
patent
5 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Glycoprotein Nonmetastatic B Is an Independent Prognostic Indicator of Recurrence and a Novel Therapeutic Target in Breast Cancer
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, March 2010
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-1611
Pubmed ID
Authors

April A.N. Rose, Andrée-Anne Grosset, Zhifeng Dong, Caterina Russo, Patricia A. MacDonald, Nicholas R. Bertos, Yves St-Pierre, Ronit Simantov, Michael Hallett, Morag Park, Louis Gaboury, Peter M. Siegel

Abstract

Although the murine orthologue of glycoprotein nonmetastatic B (GPNMB), Osteoactivin, promotes breast cancer metastasis in an in vivo mouse model, its importance in human breast cancer is unknown. We have examined the significance of GPNMB expression as a prognostic indicator of recurrence and assessed its potential as a novel therapeutic target in breast cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
Malaysia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 94 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Researcher 17 17%
Other 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 23 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,647,769
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#1,256
of 12,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,913
of 95,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#8
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.