↓ Skip to main content

The mechanism for efficacy of eccentric loading in Achilles tendon injury; an in vivo study in humans

Overview of attention for article published in Rheumatology, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
401 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The mechanism for efficacy of eccentric loading in Achilles tendon injury; an in vivo study in humans
Published in
Rheumatology, August 2008
DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/ken262
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. D. Rees, G. A. Lichtwark, R. L. Wolman, A. M. Wilson

Abstract

Degenerative disorders of tendons present an enormous clinical challenge. They are extremely common, prone to recur and existing medical and surgical treatments are generally unsatisfactory. Recently eccentric, but not concentric, exercises have been shown to be highly effective in managing tendinopathy of the Achilles (and other) tendons. The mechanism for the efficacy of these exercises is unknown although it has been speculated that forces generated during eccentric loading are of a greater magnitude. Our objective was to determine the mechanism for the beneficial effect of eccentric exercise in Achilles tendinopathy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 401 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 390 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 17%
Student > Bachelor 67 17%
Researcher 42 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 8%
Other 31 8%
Other 89 22%
Unknown 70 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 116 29%
Sports and Recreations 70 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 70 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 4%
Engineering 13 3%
Other 26 6%
Unknown 91 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,952,451
of 24,449,189 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology
#1,190
of 6,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,822
of 88,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,449,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.