You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The mechanism for efficacy of eccentric loading in Achilles tendon injury; an in vivo study in humans
|
---|---|
Published in |
Rheumatology, August 2008
|
DOI | 10.1093/rheumatology/ken262 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
J. D. Rees, G. A. Lichtwark, R. L. Wolman, A. M. Wilson |
Abstract |
Degenerative disorders of tendons present an enormous clinical challenge. They are extremely common, prone to recur and existing medical and surgical treatments are generally unsatisfactory. Recently eccentric, but not concentric, exercises have been shown to be highly effective in managing tendinopathy of the Achilles (and other) tendons. The mechanism for the efficacy of these exercises is unknown although it has been speculated that forces generated during eccentric loading are of a greater magnitude. Our objective was to determine the mechanism for the beneficial effect of eccentric exercise in Achilles tendinopathy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 3 | 18% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
United States | 2 | 12% |
Ireland | 1 | 6% |
Canada | 1 | 6% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 76% |
Scientists | 3 | 18% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 401 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Norway | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 390 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 68 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 67 | 17% |
Researcher | 42 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 8% |
Other | 31 | 8% |
Other | 89 | 22% |
Unknown | 70 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 116 | 29% |
Sports and Recreations | 70 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 70 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 4% |
Engineering | 13 | 3% |
Other | 26 | 6% |
Unknown | 91 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,952,451
of 24,449,189 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology
#1,190
of 6,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,822
of 88,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,449,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.