| Title |
Softening the Blow: Company Self-Disclosure of Negative Information Lessens Damaging Effects on Consumer Judgment and Decision Making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10551-013-1647-9 |
| Authors |
Bob M. Fennis, Wolfgang Stroebe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Researcher | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 38 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 17% |
| Psychology | 12 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,140,021
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#384
of 3,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,982
of 302,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#5
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.