↓ Skip to main content

How can contributors to open-source communities be trusted? On the assumption, inference, and substitution of trust

Overview of attention for article published in Ethics and Information Technology, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
How can contributors to open-source communities be trusted? On the assumption, inference, and substitution of trust
Published in
Ethics and Information Technology, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10676-010-9230-x
Authors

Paul B. de Laat

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Canada 2 3%
France 1 2%
Ecuador 1 2%
Indonesia 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 2%
Romania 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 55 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 23%
Student > Master 15 23%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Researcher 6 9%
Professor 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 29 44%
Social Sciences 7 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 9%
Philosophy 4 6%
Arts and Humanities 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 7 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2023.
All research outputs
#4,225,990
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Ethics and Information Technology
#143
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,571
of 98,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ethics and Information Technology
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.