| Title |
Designing clinical practice feedback reports: three steps illustrated in Veterans Health Affairs long-term care facilities and programs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-019-0950-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zach Landis-Lewis, Jennifer Kononowech, Winifred J. Scott, Robert V. Hogikyan, Joan G. Carpenter, V. S. Periyakoil, Susan C. Miller, Cari Levy, Mary Ersek, Anne Sales |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 26% |
| Canada | 3 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Malawi | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 58% |
| Scientists | 10 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 24% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,917,530
of 25,363,685 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#367
of 1,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,490
of 474,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,363,685 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.