↓ Skip to main content

Which Methodological Practice(s) for Psychotherapy Science? A Systematic Review and a Proposal

Overview of attention for article published in Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Which Methodological Practice(s) for Psychotherapy Science? A Systematic Review and a Proposal
Published in
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12124-019-09494-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Omar Carlo Gioacchino Gelo, Gloria Lagetto, Chiara Dinoi, Erika Belfiore, Elisa Lombi, Stefano Blasi, Massimo Aria, Enrico Ciavolino

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 29%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 24%
Social Sciences 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2020.
All research outputs
#19,624,055
of 24,133,587 outputs
Outputs from Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science
#313
of 358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,048
of 354,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,133,587 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.